THE ARAB ISRAELI CONFLICT |
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
<-> |
|
The question of Jerusalem |
|
the Gaza war and the crisis of the greater Middle East: impact on US foreign policy and transatlantic relations |
While the Israel-Hamas Conflict, like all conflicts, has its own unique history and immediate causes, it is also representative of a broader crisis that has characterized the Middle East for the past two decades. That crisis has its roots in the weakening and, in some cases, the collapse of state authority in the Arab world. That collapse empowered non-state actors to challenge state authority and struggle with their domestic rivals for control over the fallen Arab regimes. Some regional states had always been weak domestically, open to external intervention, like Lebanon. However, the beginning of the current crisis can be marked by the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the subsequent destruction, as a matter of policy, of the Iraqi state. It continued with the popular uprisings of the Arab Spring of 2011, which led to the collapse of regimes in Tunisia and Egypt and to civil wars in Libya, Syria and Yemen. The political vacuums created by the weakening and collapse of state authority invited outside interventions in these countries, as local groups sought allies in their struggles for power. Both the US and European states have been some of the most prolific interveners in the region, with doubtful results for their efforts. However, Iran most successfully extended its influence into these weakened states and civil wars, by developing strong links to non-state actors who were more than willing to act as part of the overall Iranian regional strategy.
The Israel-Hamas Conflict has all of these characteristics. The weakness of the Palestinian Authority permitted a non-state actor, Hamas, to gain power in the Gaza Strip. Hamas developed links with regional powers, most notably Iran but also Qatar, which helped it consolidate its control of Gaza. Both Egypt and Israel, while opposed to Hamas’ Islamist political project, dealt with the organization for their own purposes. As a non-state actor, Hamas did not have the same stake in the local or regional status-quo that existing governments have, and thus was willing to take dramatic and violent action to change that status quo (December 7, 2023, HCSS, Transatlantic Dialogue series) |
The report |
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict:
Brussels, October 15th,2023 |
It calls for a re-foundation of the United Nations and the transfer of its headquarters to a rebuilt GAZA
Introduction: |
|
the escalating violence in the Gaza Strip and Israel |
The conversation featured Steven A. Cook, Eni Enrico Mattei Senior Fellow for Middle East and Africa Studies and Director of the International Affairs Fellowship for Tenured International Relations Scholars, Council on Foreign Relations, Farah Pandith, Adjunct Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, Ray Takeyh, Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle East Studies, Council on Foreign Relations, and Michael Froman,President, Council on Foreign Relations, Moderating
|
the Middle East and the future of Israel / the critical process in building each and every institution |
On the campus of the ASPEN Institute Israel Ambassador Michael B. Oren spoke frankly about the Middle East and the future of Israel. While Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad talked in 2009 about the critical process by which people must engage in building each and every institution that eventually makes up a viable state.
There were discussions about the issue of settlements, the need for Israel to be recognized as a Jewish state and examples of existential threats to Israel’s existence. Oren in discussion illustrated the need for the change in the hateful PA education and programming. Ambassador Oren made reference to his article: … “The State of Israel copes not only with one but with at least seven existential threats on a daily basis. These threats are extraordinary not only for their number but also for their diversity. Leaders in politics, economics, history and culture were gathered to discuss and debate the Middle East, with a special emphasis on comprehending the current challenges to peace. Viewed were ideas and initiatives now underway - such as new policies, reforms, negotations and economic development proposals - that could ease tensions, strengthen relationships across borders and perhaps even help effect a lasting peace. 'In fact the kind of state that we want to have, that we aspire to have, is one that would definitely espouse high values of tolerance, co-existence, mutual respect and deference to all cultures, religions. No discrimination whatsoever, on any basis whatsoever. |
"An oppressed nation has the right to say it has been enough. You may not expect from nobody who put up with injustice, certainly not the Palestines, who suffered from occupation decennia long. Is that not where Gandhi stand for, where Martin Luther King stand for?" (Ha'artez, 2-4-2010). |
I do not need anyone to remind me that we’re doing it under occupation. I know that. But we are doing it because we are under occupation, in spite of the occupation, to end it. We [have to] create the state as a fact on the ground in a positive way—in response to adversity, in spite of the adversity, to end the adversity. So that two years from now, … I hope it will not be difficult for anyone to look toward us and come to the conclusion: Indeed the Palestinians do have a state, but for the occupation. … If we do that, we’ll have succeeded. That’s our message. It’s a progressive message, it’s a positive message. Fayyad: You know, I can only hope so. And I really would hate to think that the politics from either side would continue to drive this process forever in the wrong direction, because a good part of the failure is due to that and is due to time wasted on speculating whether or not there is a partner here or there is a partner there. … Let’s all measure up; let’s all do what we all have to do. And each focus on those requirements—look, the roadmap did not say who begins what first when. It said, You Palestinians have to do this; you Israelis have to do that. A lot of time was wasted on who goes first and who goes second and all of that. And we all paid dearly for it; Israelis and Palestinians alike. … Indeed, the world at large. So I call on Israeli leadership to basically do what has to be done. I call on us to do what we have to do. And what I like about the new paradigm, if it is that and I hope it is, is for us both to be expected to deliver. … The bar has to be raised. We both should act with much greater sense of urgency. We both should feel accountable. Look, we can’t do it alone. |
|
|
|
chronological summary |
East Jerusalem contains holy places for Jews, Christians and Muslims. The main ones are:
- the Wailing Wall (Western Wall), remnant of the Jewish Temple ca 1000 BC King David conquers Jerusalem from the Jebusites, his successor King Solomon builds the First Temple destruction of the temple by Nebuchadnezzar return of the Jews from Babylonian captivity, rebuilding of the walls under Ezra and Nehemiah and the temple destruction of the Temple by Titus Muslims conquer Jerusalem, build Al Aksa mosque under Caliph Omar Crusaders conquer Jerusalem, Godfrey of Bouillon 1915: Sir Henry McMahon, British High Commissioner in Egypt, offered Sherif Hussein of Mecca an independent Arab state if he would help the British fight against the Ottoman Turks. Hussein's interest in throwing off his Turkish overlords converged with Britain's war aim of defeating the Ottomans 1916: Sykes-Picot agreement: partition of the regio in French and British spheres of influence 1917: Balfour declaration: a jewish national home in Palestina 1918 Jerusalem falls into British hands 1920: Treaty of San Remo: Syria and Libanon became a French mandate, Palestine, Joran and Iraq British mandate (Egypt was already in the hands of the British, Northern Africa for the greater part French and the Arabian peninsula independent) 1922: English treaty mandate, which provided to ensure Jews throughout Palestine, when Israel and the West Bank, would have the right to close settlement 1945: the Quincy meeting, that means a determination to assert US influence in a zone which is strategic to America security, the strengthening of energy security, the fight against terrorist groups, a determination to contain Iranian influence and a firm commitment to Israel's security 1947 According to the UN partition plan of Palestine, Jerusalem and the surrounding area must become a corpus separatum, freely accessible to Jews, Christians and Muslims 1947: 1948-1949 Israel conquers West Jerusalem and Trans-Jordan conquers East Jerusalem, the international community accepts the status quo. After the proclaim of the state of Israel the Arab states attacked, followed by the independence war, during which Israel extended their territory. Jordan captured the West Bank and Egypt the Gaza strip. Armistice Agreements ended the official hostilities of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and established armistice lines between Israel and the Jordanian-held West Bank, also known as the Green Line. 1956: Suez crisis. Egypt (Nasser) nationalized the Suez Canal. After that there followed a combined attack by Israel, United Kingdom and France. Under great pressure by the US and USSR the attackers had to pull back 1967 Israel conquers the West Bank including East Jerusalem. The rise of Palestine nationalism (international terrorism) 1970: Jordan civil war 1973: October Jom Kippoer war. Unexpected attack by Egypt and Syria to re-capture Sinai and Golan. During the war Arab oil states causes the so called first oil crisis. The war ends by the intervention by the Great Powers in a militairy deadlock 1975: start of Libanon civil war 1977: in the occupied territories the Likoed governments (Begin) started to build jewish settlements. 1979: peace treaty between Egypt and Israel 1980 de facto annexation 1982: June Extended Israelian invasion in Libanon directed to the siege of Beirut, the retreat of the PLO (to Tunis) and massacres in Sabra and Chatilia 1985: Israel's pull back from Beirut, except the security line in the South 1987: December the start of the Intifada (Palestinian revolt) in the Gaza Strip 1991: after the Gulf war (Iraq attacks Israel with scuds) the Madrid conference was arranged under pressure of the USA. The result of this was a separate peace deliberation between Israel and the Arab states 1994: Arafat settled in Gaza a Palestinian National Authority and Israel and Jordan signed in September a peace treaty 1995: Rabin murdered in November 1996: stagnation in the peace process till 1999 (Netanyahu) 2000: Camp David summit (July/August) between Barak and Arafat failed. A visist of Sharon in September to the Temple Mount leads to the second Intifada (Palestinian attacks by self murders and Israelian recaptured of Palestinian territory) 2003: Roadmap to the peace of the Quartet (USA, EU, Russia and the UN), to stop all settlement-activities 2007: Annapolis agreement, which confirmed the obligation from 2003 to stop all settlement-activities Changes in Jerusalem since 1967 2012: UN voted on a resolution to upgrade the status of the Palestinian Authority to a non-member observer state 2013: launch Two State stress test, a new online tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of the key issues that would make or break a two-state outcome between Israel and Palestine 2020: Israel and the Arab World Are Making Peace (Abraham Accords Peace Agreements) 2023: Israel - Hamas war 2024: on April 14, Iran directly attacks Israel. The attack is a "response to the numerous crimes committed by the Zionist regime," the Iranian Revolutionary Guards said. The immediate reason was the Israeli bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1. |